miércoles, 26 de octubre de 2011

Financial stability in emerging markets: Dealing with global liquidity

Simposio

Pre Keynesian monetary theories of the Great Depression

Aca

How to understand the limits of financial models

Aca

"After 20 years on Wall Street, I’m a disbeliever in grand financial theories. We do have a variety of financial models, but financial modeling is not the physics of markets. The similarity of physics and finance lies more in their syntax than in their semantics. In physics you’re playing against God, and He doesn’t change His laws very often. In finance you’re playing against God’s creatures, agents who value assets based on their ephemeral opinions."

"If you are someone who cannot distinguish between God’s creations and man’s idols, you may mistake models for deep laws. Many economists are such people."

"Economists for the most part have never seen a genuinely successful theory. The simple models they work with fail to reflect the complex reality of the world around them. That lack of success is not the fault of economists, for people, unlike matter, are difficult to theorize about. But it is the economists’ fault that they take their simple models so seriously."

"At the end of the cold war, we imagined a future with no more history, a smooth stroll into the sunrise accompanied by democracy, privatization and free markets. It hasn’t worked out that way. Authoritarian versions of capitalism have spread. Privatization has become oligarchy. The gaps between rich and poor, managers and workers, and owners and employees have widened. Economic models have misfired, and financial models have proved to be enormously inaccurate. More recently, the prescribed cure of a Keynesian stimulus to jump-start spending and employment has had only a muted effect. Low interest rates, the Federal Reserve’s cure for past crises and the progenitor of future ones, are being prescribed again. Lessons have not been learned."

"Any assurance economists pretend to with regard to cause and effect is merely a pose"

"Everyone should understand the difference between a model and reality, and no one should be astonished by the inability of one- or two-inch equations to represent the convolutions of people and markets."

"• Think of models as gedanken experiments. No model is correct, but models can provide immensely helpful ways to estimate value. I like to think of financial models as gedanken, or thought, experiments, like those Einstein carried out when he pictured himself surfing a light wave, or Schrödinger when he pictured a macroscopic cat subject to quantum interference. I believe that’s the right way to use mathematical models in finance, and the way experienced practitioners do use them. Models are only models, not the thing in itself. Models are better regarded as a collection of parallel thought universes to explore. Each universe should be consistent, but, unlike the world of matter, the world of financial concepts and the minds of the humans that interact with them are going to be infinitely more complex than any model you make.

Beware of idolatry. The greatest conceptual danger is idolatry: believing that someone can write down a theory that encapsulates human behavior and thereby free you of the obligation to think for yourself. A model may be entrancing, but no matter how hard you try, you will not be able to breathe life into it. To confuse a model with a theory is to believe that humans obey mathematical rules, and to invite future disaster."

A note on fiscal policy in a depressed economy

Brad DeLong

Central banks cannot 'do nothing'

Aca

Floating rate treasuries

Aca

The future of banking

Ebook

Why is Italy doing so much worse these days?

Tyler Cowen

Cuando el Banco de Inglaterra rompió sus reglas

Brad DeLong

sábado, 22 de octubre de 2011

The only way to save the economy: Break up the giant, insolvent banks

Muchas opiniones y análisis

La necesidad del mercado de deuda publica

Aca

Crítica a Hecksher-Ohlin

Aca

The capitalist network that rules the world

Interesante

Visiones marxistas de la crisis

Aca. Comentario de Yves Smith

The six myths of US monetary policy during the Great Recession

Aca. Otro post. Otro

Money is debt

Matt Rognlie. Más de Rognlie

Did God over invest in land?

Nick Rowe

lunes, 17 de octubre de 2011

Effects of sovereign government budget deficits on saving, reserves and interest rates

Randall Wray

Government budget deficits and the 'two-step' process of saving

Reserves, governement bond sales, and savings

Monetary policy as threat strategy. Chuck Norris and central banks

Nick Rowe

The case for a nominal GDP [NGDP] target

Goldman Sachs. Reacciones

Bill Woolsey

David Beckworth vs Greg Mankiw

Más reacciones

NGDP targeting is not about 'stimulus'

Brad DeLong. Reacción a Krugman. Comentario a DeLong. Otro

What is nominal GDP targeting

NGDP targeting links

Stephen Williamson. Respuesta a Williamson

What is NGDP targeting? Respuesta de DeLong

Diálogo socrático de DeLong

Nick Rowe

Three objections in NGDP level targeting

Implementing nominal GDP targeting via monetary authorities alone

Can Knut Wicksell beat up Chuck Norris? All Chuck Norris really needs is stamina

McCallum and targeting the growth rate of nominal GDP

Understanding NGDP targeting

Supply shocks and NGDP targeting

Kelly Evans on NGDP

Christina Romer también pide NGDP targeting

Nick Rowe: Negative natural rates of interest and NGDP targets

What is NGDP?

Nominal GDP targeting and stagflation

Diferencias entre varios esquemas de política monetaria

“Ben Volcker” and the monetary transmission mechanism

Daylight saving time and NGDP targeting

Tres respuestas a Greg Ip: Aca, aca y aca

The case for an NGDP target

The world is nominal

Friedman provided a theory for NGDP targeting


Reply to Noahpinion and Andy Harless on NGDP/inflation

NGDP targeting is not a Keynesian business cycle policy

Scott Sumner vs John Taylor. Varios le responden a Taylor

Does nominal GDP exist?

La Fed discutió la posibilidad de adoptar un objetivo de NGDP. Comentan Scott Sumner, David Beckworth, Bill Woolsey

Otro comentario sobre NGDP

George Selgin vs John Taylor. Scott Sumner interviene. Y David Glasner

Paper de Scott Sumner

Monetary policy can't fix all problems

Growth or level targeting?

Una explicación de NGDP targeting

Scott Sumner sobre NGDP y la crisis

Tyler Cowen y Scott Sumer sobre level targeting NGDP targeting: Some questions. Responde Scott Sumner. Y Nick Rowe. David Glasner. Bill Woolsey. David Andolfatto responde Algunas crìticas al NGDP targeting Argumentos a favor

Debt, deficits, and Modern Monetary Theory

Aca

The dark, dark era of money demand

Matt Rognlie

What causes hyperinflation?

Aca

What's needed in a macro model?

Matt Rognlie y Brad DeLong. Más de DeLong

David Beckworth

Japan’s deflation story is not really a horror story

Aca

The bloody rise of the dollar system

Aca

sábado, 8 de octubre de 2011

A primer on the new era of monetary policy

Matt Rognlie

Do balance sheets matter?

Aca. The NAIRU and balance sheets

Wicksell and the hot potato

Nick Rowe

The Rise of the Renminbi as International Currency: Historical Precedents

Aca

Artículo en VoxEU

Análisis sobre la crisis actual

Aca

Rajiv Sethi sobre Keynes

Aca

Why do some countries economies grow faster?

Respuestas usando estadística física

Keynes vs la NSN

Aca. Más

Capital is enough

Aca

From Marx to Goldman Sachs: The fictions of fictitious capital

Aca

The map is not the territory: An essay on the state of economics

Aca