Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Inflación. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Inflación. Mostrar todas las entradas
martes, 10 de diciembre de 2013
domingo, 27 de octubre de 2013
miércoles, 11 de septiembre de 2013
sábado, 29 de junio de 2013
martes, 11 de junio de 2013
miércoles, 5 de junio de 2013
Inflación de bienes vs inflación de servicios
Ryan Avent
"More simply, services inflation is about expectations and unemployment, while goods inflation is about global capacity utilisation. That makes sense; to a first approximation services are people. Goods are also people, a little bit. But they are more energy, materials, and supply chains. Goods prices rise faster when one of those three factors bumps up against constraints. Service prices rise faster when there aren't enough people to go around.
...
I like this way of digging into CPI data. But I also think it mostly reinforces the point that what monetary policy is really interested in is the labour-market output gap and its relation to wage growth. The prices for "stuff" don't matter, and we don't care if factories or stores close so long as everyone who wants to work can. The goods-services distinction is useful in that it shows us once again that on that basis the Fed has done far too little."
"More simply, services inflation is about expectations and unemployment, while goods inflation is about global capacity utilisation. That makes sense; to a first approximation services are people. Goods are also people, a little bit. But they are more energy, materials, and supply chains. Goods prices rise faster when one of those three factors bumps up against constraints. Service prices rise faster when there aren't enough people to go around.
...
I like this way of digging into CPI data. But I also think it mostly reinforces the point that what monetary policy is really interested in is the labour-market output gap and its relation to wage growth. The prices for "stuff" don't matter, and we don't care if factories or stores close so long as everyone who wants to work can. The goods-services distinction is useful in that it shows us once again that on that basis the Fed has done far too little."
viernes, 24 de mayo de 2013
martes, 30 de abril de 2013
martes, 5 de marzo de 2013
viernes, 18 de enero de 2013
viernes, 4 de enero de 2013
miércoles, 19 de diciembre de 2012
viernes, 2 de noviembre de 2012
domingo, 30 de septiembre de 2012
domingo, 12 de agosto de 2012
lunes, 30 de julio de 2012
domingo, 29 de julio de 2012
DeLong vs Cochrane sobre la posibilidad de inflación
Aca
DeLong apuesta con Noah Smith
Màs
"...Of that, it looks as though on net about 2/3 are purchases of U.S. government debt and government-guaranteed debt. Call it $350 billion/year. Current foreign holdings of U.S. government and government-guaranteed debt look to be about $6 trillion. $350 billion/$6 trillion means that foreigners are adding to their holdings of U.S. government and government guaranteed debt at a pace of about 5.8%/year. With world nominal GDP outside the United States growing at about 6%/year, that means that foreigners are… buying about as much U.S. Treasury, Agency, and other goverenment-guaranteed debt as they should in order to keep their portfolio shares constant.
It does not look as if it is the case that the US government is running out of its foreign-based debt capacity.
Could foreigners all of a sudden decided that there governments are not worse than the US government, decide to dump US government bonds and buy their own country bonds, send the dollar down, and have that falling dollar set off a upwards surge of import prices that then set off an inflationary spiral here at home? Yes. Is this a high probability scenario? I confess that I do not see how: imports are a relatively small fraction of total US spending, foreign governments are at least as feckless as our own and are subject to political risks that we are not, and nobody--literally nobody, not even the people Cochrane talks to directly--is willing to bet any money on Cochrane's favored scenario."
Un comentarista: "Note also that foreigners dropping US debt would cause high interest rates which would lower demand. Given the ratio of imports to GDP, this effect could dominate. And with the Federal Funds rate of around zero, the idea that the Fed could do nothing to fight inflation is really utterly totally crazy. Not to mention that inflation would be an excellent thing (better 5% than 2% and, I think, better 10% than 5% except for the fact that the Fed could and would respond)."
DeLong apuesta con Noah Smith
Màs
"...Of that, it looks as though on net about 2/3 are purchases of U.S. government debt and government-guaranteed debt. Call it $350 billion/year. Current foreign holdings of U.S. government and government-guaranteed debt look to be about $6 trillion. $350 billion/$6 trillion means that foreigners are adding to their holdings of U.S. government and government guaranteed debt at a pace of about 5.8%/year. With world nominal GDP outside the United States growing at about 6%/year, that means that foreigners are… buying about as much U.S. Treasury, Agency, and other goverenment-guaranteed debt as they should in order to keep their portfolio shares constant.
It does not look as if it is the case that the US government is running out of its foreign-based debt capacity.
Could foreigners all of a sudden decided that there governments are not worse than the US government, decide to dump US government bonds and buy their own country bonds, send the dollar down, and have that falling dollar set off a upwards surge of import prices that then set off an inflationary spiral here at home? Yes. Is this a high probability scenario? I confess that I do not see how: imports are a relatively small fraction of total US spending, foreign governments are at least as feckless as our own and are subject to political risks that we are not, and nobody--literally nobody, not even the people Cochrane talks to directly--is willing to bet any money on Cochrane's favored scenario."
Un comentarista: "Note also that foreigners dropping US debt would cause high interest rates which would lower demand. Given the ratio of imports to GDP, this effect could dominate. And with the Federal Funds rate of around zero, the idea that the Fed could do nothing to fight inflation is really utterly totally crazy. Not to mention that inflation would be an excellent thing (better 5% than 2% and, I think, better 10% than 5% except for the fact that the Fed could and would respond)."
lunes, 16 de julio de 2012
Monetary policy, money and inflation
Paper de la Fed de San Francisco
Textbook monetary theory holds that increasing the money supply leads to higher inflation. However, the Federal Reserve has tripled the monetary base since 2008 without inflation surging. With interest rates at historically low levels and the economy still struggling, the normal money multiplier process has broken down and inflation pressures remain subdued.
Textbook monetary theory holds that increasing the money supply leads to higher inflation. However, the Federal Reserve has tripled the monetary base since 2008 without inflation surging. With interest rates at historically low levels and the economy still struggling, the normal money multiplier process has broken down and inflation pressures remain subdued.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)